Why the Boston Marathon bombing won’t erode civil liberties

From the moment that Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was pulled out of a boat in Watertown, Mass., the debate over civil liberties and domestic anti-terrorism policies, largely dormant in recent years, was reignited. …

But research conducted shortly after 9/11, combined with some recent polling data, suggests that Americans may be unlikely to trade civil liberties for a greater sense of security as a result of the bombing. That’s because the attack hasn’t made the public significantly more fearful of future domestic terrorism, and because trust in government is low. [cont.]

Danny Hayes (GWU), Washington Post

Recent polls: Terrorism

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.