2016 was an ordinary election, not a realignment

Political scientists will be analyzing the bases of Donald Trump’s dramatic victory for a very long time. So far, the evidence points toward a toxic brew of economic and cultural anxiety, populism, racial resentment, sexism and authoritarianism, among other factors. But from a broader perspective, the search for specific explanations for Trump’s support is probably misguided. An extraordinary campaign has produced a remarkably ordinary election outcome, primarily reflecting partisan patterns familiar from previous election cycles. CONT.

Larry M. Bartels (Vanderbilt), The Monkey Cage

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.