Why you should be skeptical of wacky new studies about what sways elections

This has been a rough year for pollsters and pundits, with prediction after prediction going painfully awry. Even those supposedly unflappable data journalists have found themselves stepping in it.

But it’s not just the journalists and pollsters. Since I’m a professor of statistics as well as a blogger who often comments on academic papers that I think misuse numbers, I have a front-row seat to some of the least persuasive academic takes on politics and elections. And it’s been a big year for bad studies. CONT.

Andrew Gelman (Columbia), Vox

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.